CommonHall

Jump to

  • PageFind my representativesFrom your address
  • PageBillsSearch and filter every bill
  • PageVotesEvery House and Senate roll call
  • PageMassachusettsLegislature and state bills
  • PageBoston City CouncilCouncilors, district map, meetings
  • PageDiscussionsHave your say

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to close

H.R. 1692 · 119th Congress

Producing Advanced Technologies for Homeland Security Act

PATHS Act

Introduced Feb 27, 2025Policy area: Government Operations and Politics

Read the textOn Congress.gov

Status: Passed House

  1. Introduced
  2. Committee
  3. Passed House
  4. Passed Senate
  5. To President
  6. Law

Latest action

: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Summary

Producing Advanced Technologies for Homeland Security Act or the PATHS Act

This bill extends through FY2028 the authority of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to use other transactions (OT) to carry out research and prototype projects when the use of contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements is not feasible or appropriate. (OTs, in contrast to traditional procurement contracts, are exempt from many federal procurement laws and regulations.) DHS must notify Congress within 72 hours of using or extending this authority for research and development projects related to artificial intelligence technology and must offer to brief Congress on the rationale for such a decision.

The bill also lowers from $4 million to $1 million the minimum value of contract awards that DHS must publicly report on its website.

Summary by the Congressional Research Service.

Actions

  1. Senate

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  2. House

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. House

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: 3/10/2025 CR H1055)

  4. House

    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1127)

  5. House

    At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Green (TN) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

  6. House

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1692.

  7. House

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1055-1056)

  8. House

    Mr. Green (TN) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  9. House

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.

  10. House

    Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

  11. Introduced in House